
Computational recognition of native-like folds of an anonymous amino acid sequence from a protein fold database is considered to be a promising approach to the three-dimensional (3D) fold prediction of the amino acid sequence. We present a new method for protein fold recognition through optimally aligning an amino acid sequence and a protein fold template (protein threading). The fitness of aligning an amino acid sequence with a fold template is measured by (1) the singleton fitness, representing the compatibility of substituting one amino acid by another and the combined preference of secondary structure and solvent accessibility for a particular amino acid, (2) the pairwise interaction, representing the contact preference between a pair of amino acids, and (3) alignment gap penalties. Though a protein threading problem so defined is known to be NP-hard in the most general sense, our algorithm runs efficiently if we place a cutoff distance on the pairwise interactions, as many of the existing threading programs do. For an amino acid sequence of size n and a fold template of size m with M core secondary structures, the algorithm finds an optimal alignment in O (Mn1.5C + 1 + mnC + 1) time and O (MnC + 1) space, where C is a (small) nonnegative integer, determined by a particular mathematical property of the pairwise interactions. As a case study, we have demonstrated that C is less than or equal to 4 for about 75% of the 293 unique folds in our protein database, when pairwise interactions are restricted to amino acids 4, when threading requires too much memory and time to be practical on a typical workstation.
Protein Folding, Databases, Factual, Thermodynamics, Amino Acid Sequence, Sequence Alignment, Algorithms
Protein Folding, Databases, Factual, Thermodynamics, Amino Acid Sequence, Sequence Alignment, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
