Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Diagnostic value of serum Ca 19-9 antigen in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma].

Authors: A, Nouts; P, Lévy; H, Voitot; P, Bernades;

[Diagnostic value of serum Ca 19-9 antigen in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma].

Abstract

The value of serum Ca 19-9 dosage for pancreatic carcinoma diagnosis has been studied in heterogeneous series. The effect of the complications of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma on serum Ca 19-9 value has not been assessed precisely. The aims of this study were to assess: a) the value of Ca 19-9 to differentiate benign from malignant pancreatic disease; b) the influence of complications (particularly, cholestasis).The studied population included 179 patients: 126 with chronic pancreatitis (25 females, 101 males, 45 with cholestasis) and 53 with pancreatic carcinoma (27 females, 26 males, 37 with cholestasis).At 37 UI/mL threshold, the specificity and sensitivity of Ca 19-9 were 53 and 95%, respectively. Cholestasis was associated with a significant increase of Ca 19-9 in patients with chronic pancreatitis but not in those with pancreatic carcinoma. At 300 UI/mL threshold, the specificity and sensitivity of Ca 19-9 were 95 and 81% in patients without cholestasis and 87 and 81% in those with cholestasis, respectively. Diabetes mellitus was associated with a significant increase of Ca 19-9 only in patients with chronic pancreatitis without cholestasis. Pancreatic calcifications, pseudocysts, cirrhosis, pleural effusion or ascites were not associated with significant variation of Ca 19-9.In patients with pancreatic disease, 300 UI/mL threshold is the most accurate to differentiate benign from malignant disease, whatever the presence of cholestasis.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Cholestasis, CA-19-9 Antigen, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Reference Values, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!