
To assess an automated algorithm, developed for the classification of normal and cancerous colonic mucosa, using geometric analysis of features and texture analysis.Twenty-one images were analyzed, 10 from normal and 11 from cancerous mucosa. The classification was based on a regularity index dependent on shape, object orientation for establishing parallelism and five texture features derived using the co-occurrence image analysis method.Geometric analysis yielded an overall classification accuracy of 80%. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 64%, respectively. Using texture analysis, the overall classification accuracy was 90%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 100%, respectively.This initial study demonstrated that geometric and texture analysis techniques show promise for automated analysis of colon cancer.
Carcinoma, Reproducibility of Results, Predictive Value of Tests, Colonic Neoplasms, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Algorithms, Image Cytometry
Carcinoma, Reproducibility of Results, Predictive Value of Tests, Colonic Neoplasms, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Algorithms, Image Cytometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
