
The incidence of malignancies after transplantation is higher when compared with expected cancer in control patients, particularly skin and female genital cancer, non-Hodgkin's disease and Kaposi's sarcoma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency and the efficacy of the treatment of cancer following renal transplantation.A retrospective analysis of 404 recipients was performed and it showed the onset of 15 cancers (8 skin cancers, 3 Kaposi's sarcomas, 2 renal carcinomas, 1 urotelioma and 1 colon cancer) in 11 patients (3.7%). At the time of diagnosis, the mean period of immunosuppressive therapy (7 cases of double therapy, 4 cases of triple therapy) was 44.8 months. Skin cancer (53.3%) and Kaposi's sarcoma (20%) were the most frequent in personal experience as reported in literature. Neither lymphomas, nor female genital cancers were detected.All the cases were surgically treated, except patients with Kaposi's sarcoma, whose immunosuppressive therapy was reduced without alteration of renal function. Death-rate was 0.25% (1 case), the remaining patients show no signs of local recurrence or metastasis with preserved renal function except for the patient with renal carcinoma of the transplanted kidney, who underwent nephrectomy and returned in replacement therapy.The conclusion is drawn that the research of relationship between type of immunosuppressive therapy and cancer incidence and careful clinical and instrumental examination of transplant patients may contribute to reduce the onset of neoplastic degenerations and lead to an early diagnosis.
Male, Skin Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Agents, Middle Aged, Kidney Transplantation, Kidney Neoplasms, Postoperative Complications, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Sarcoma, Kaposi, Immunosuppressive Agents, Retrospective Studies
Male, Skin Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Agents, Middle Aged, Kidney Transplantation, Kidney Neoplasms, Postoperative Complications, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Sarcoma, Kaposi, Immunosuppressive Agents, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
