Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Neurofibromatosis versus schwannomatosis].

Authors: V F, Mautner; S, Schröder; S M, Pulst; H, Ostertag; L, Kluwe;

[Neurofibromatosis versus schwannomatosis].

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and 2 (NF1 und NF2) are different forms of neurofibromatosis, well defined both clinically and genetically. In absence of typical clinical features of NF1 (café-au-lait-spots, cutaneous neurofibromas, Lisch-nodules) or NF2 (vestibular schwanoma) clinical classification is often not possible. Neurofibromas are more common in NF1 and schwannomas are typical for NF2, but pathological histology does not provide sufficient evidence for diagnosis. We describe 14 patients who presented with the clinical picture of multiple spinal tumours. Detailed family history, exact clinical examination including an ophthalmological examination led to the diagnosis of NF2 in four cases. Mutation analysis confirmed the diagnosis of NF2 in one case by identification of a 163 base pair deletion in the NF2 transcript. To investigate the expression of schwannomin and neurofibromin we stained tumour paraffin sections of six patients with antibodies against peptides of the NF1 and the NF2 protein. Based on preserved immunoreactivities we were able to exclude diagnosis of NF1 in three and NF2 in two cases. In four patients the clinical symptoms could confirm the diagnosis of schwannomatosis. Combining the results of clinical, neurogenetical and immunohistochemical examinations we could diagnose NF1 or NF2 in ten patients in total. Immunoreactivity led to the suggestion of NF2 in two patients; the other two patients whose tumours were not stained so far, could as yet not be classified for NF.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Neurofibromatoses, Brain Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Diagnosis, Differential, Mutation, Humans, Lymphocytes, RNA, Messenger, Neurilemmoma, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!