Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Porous polyethylene orbital implant in patients with retinoblastoma.

Authors: Z A, Karcioglu; S A, al-Mesfer; P B, Mullaney;

Porous polyethylene orbital implant in patients with retinoblastoma.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess integration of porous polyethylene allografts in 37 anophthalmic sockets of retinoblastoma enucleations.A clinical review.Thirty-four patients (19 female, 15 male) whose age when diagnosed with retinoblastoma ranged from 1 to 72 months participated. Sixteen patients had unilateral retinoblastoma and 18 had bilateral retinoblastoma.Enucleation (3 bilateral, 31 unilateral) with implantation of a porous polyethylene (PP) sphere (16-20 mm in diameter) was performed. Of the 37 spheres, 34 were primary implants and 3 were secondary implants. In the eight patients with postimplantation exposure, the PP implant had to be removed.Data on eight sockets with exposed PP implant were measured.There were no implant extrusions, but conjunctival dehiscence-exposure occurred in eight patients (21.6%). In 3 of 37 sockets, the volume replacement was not good, and in 5 cases, fornices were too shallow to accommodate a well-fitting prosthesis. In all but one socket, the overall cosmesis was graded subjectively from acceptable (grade 2) to excellent (grade 3).Although the PP implant is a useful and a less-expensive alternative to hydroxyapatite in the porous matrix implant category, if conjunctival exposure takes place, the implant presents a serious management problem because of its nonresponsiveness to medical and surgical treatments.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Eye, Artificial, Retinoblastoma, Infant, Biocompatible Materials, Prostheses and Implants, Eye Enucleation, Prosthesis Implantation, Child, Preschool, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous, Female, Polyethylenes, Child, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Orbit, Porosity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    70
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
70
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!