Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Neural tube defects (NTD)--assessment from the perspective of 25 years of studies].

Authors: J J, Pietrzyk;

[Neural tube defects (NTD)--assessment from the perspective of 25 years of studies].

Abstract

The present paper illustrates the authors 25-year experience in step by step approach to the definition of environmental and genetic background of neural tube defects. Based on the birth defects registry, a complete ascertainment of all deliveries was performed in Southern Poland during two period: 1970-1972, and 1979-1981. The birth prevalence of neural tube defects (NTD), as well as other CNS malformations was determined. The empiric recurrence risk was calculated as 3.2% +/- 1.6. Based on this figure, the relative risk (RR = 37.6 p < 0.001) and heritability (h2 = 74.7 +/- 6.7) were estimated. Our own modification of Morton's complex segregation analysis was applied. Three Mendelian (dominant, additive and recessive) and one multifactorial model were tested. The results did not provide a clear cut discrimination between different models; however the lowest 2 value was obtained for additive inheritance with 61% of penetrance and the frequency of sporadic cases equaled 55%. A search for genetic markers did not support the hypothesis that HLA-A,B,C loci are equivalents of T/t like locus in mice. The results of the study on transcobalamine levels in amniotic fluid may suggests that different transcobalamine metabolism reflects phenotypic expression of genetic susceptibility to NTD development. Current research and future perspectives on genetic and environmental background of NTD are also presented.

Keywords

Genetic Markers, Mice, Phenotype, Prevalence, Animals, Humans, Cobamides, Disease Susceptibility, Neural Tube Defects, Poland, Amniotic Fluid, Risk Assessment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!