Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography].

Authors: K, Aoyagi; Y, Kimura; H, Isono; H, Akiyama; T, Sugawara;

[Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography].

Abstract

We studied the reproducibility of multifocal electroretinography by repeated measurements in normal subjects. We also analyzed the amplitude and implicit time of the waves. Nine healthy eyes including myopic cases (-4.1 D on average) of 9 normal males, aged 19 to 42 years, were the objects of study. We used a (Visual Evoked Response Imaging System III (VERIS III), by TOMEY Corp.) for multifocal electroretinography. Each eye was examined 4 times on different days. The stimulus elements consisted of 103 hexagons. The net recording time was 4 minutes. We used the coefficient of variation (standard deviation/average) of 4 measurements of response density as index of reproducibility. Poor fixation and blinking were important factors that affected the reproducibility. In all the 9 eyes, reproducibility of multifocal electroretinography, expressed as average of the coefficient of variation of all regions, was 22% on average. In 6 eyes with good fixation and without blinking, the reproducibility was 15% on average. In 6 eyes with good reproducibility, we analyzed three parameters of the focal response waves: all traces, quadrants and rings, as well as the amplitude and latency of the waves. These data served as controls. Our studies showed that the response density correlated closely with the amplitude and not with the latency in normal subjects.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Electroretinography, Humans, Reproducibility of Results

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!