
Examination of stained peripheral blood films for evaluation of erythrocyte and platelet morphology and leukocyte differential count provides considerable data for diagnosis of various diseases including hematologic disorders. Since 1980, the use of an automated leukocyte differentiation analyzer has become common in large clinical laboratories. We surveyed the principles, performance, and characteristics of the newest automated leukocyte differential instruments, GEN.S system (Coulter), SE-9000/RAM-1 (Toa), CELL-DYN 4000 (Dainabot), ADVIA120 (Bayer-Sankyo), VEGA RETIC LC-141 (Horiba), and MICROX HEG-120N (Omron). We also compared the differentiated function of GEN.S system and CELL-DYN 4000. Automated leukocyte differentiation using two instruments correlated well with a reference method for leukocyte differential counting proposed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) H20-T (eye-count differential). The sensitivities of the suspect flag in GEN.S system and CELL-DYN 4000 were 79.3% and 83.5%, and the specificities of the two instruments were 100% and 94.9%, respectively.
Leukocyte Count, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity
Leukocyte Count, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
