
The compliance of 91 diabetic patients using oral antidiabetics was studied. Patient compliance was measured using four different methods. Patients received their medication in a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS)-container. Each time the patient went back to the pharmacy for refill prescriptions, the number of tablets left in the container were counted. Pharmacy records were used to study the number of days of delay in getting the next refill. At the end of the study, a questionnaire was sent to every patient. Using MEMS as a standard, the results show that pill count and refill data overestimate the compliance of this group of patients. The MEMS data also show that the compliance data using only the number of tablets may be biased, because of possible overconsumption. Pill count does not show a correlation with compliance as measured by MEMS. The relation between compliance as measured with MEMS and refill compliance is weak.
Ziekenhuisstructuur en organisatie van de gezondheidszorg, Adult, Epidemiology, Farmacie(FARM), Records, Pharmacy, Middle Aged, Biomedische technologie en medicijnen, Drug Prescriptions, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Patient Compliance, Public Health, Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Tablets
Ziekenhuisstructuur en organisatie van de gezondheidszorg, Adult, Epidemiology, Farmacie(FARM), Records, Pharmacy, Middle Aged, Biomedische technologie en medicijnen, Drug Prescriptions, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Patient Compliance, Public Health, Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Tablets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
