Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lung cancer.

Authors: H H, Hansen; M, Rørth;
Abstract

In small cell lung cancer (SCLC) combination chemotherapy including agents such as etoposide, teniposide, cisplatinum, carboplatin, and vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, or ifosfamide continues to be the back-bone of therapy. The epipodophyllotoxin derivatives together with cisplatin or carboplatin are being used increasingly as part of the initial therapy, and these combinations are by most investigators considered standard therapy. Complete plus partial responses to combination therapy occur in 80-90% of all patients with a median duration of 9-12 months. The median survival in these studies is at present 11-18 months depending on the initial tumour stage. The 5-year survival data remain still around 5% including a small fraction of patients (2%) initially presenting with extensive disease. The tendency is to shorten the duration of treatment to 5-8 months. The results of intensifying the treatment with the use of haematopoietic growth factors continue to be disappointing, although these are not conclusive. With respect to squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma several meta-analyses indicate that there is a statistically significant, albeit small advantage favouring cisplatinum containing chemotherapy when added to surgery in stage I and II disease and to radiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. Similarly, cisplatin containing chemotherapy is statistically superior to best supportive care in stage IV disease. The results from the latter analyses are significant at 1 and 2 years, respectively, but not at 3 and 5 years of survival. These data must, however, be considered in the light of their clinical relevance and of the balance between quality of life, toxicity, and cost of chemotherapy. The results of recently published phase III trials in stage III disease support the use of combined modalities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. For both small cell and non-small cell lung cancer a number of new agents have been evaluated over the last 2 to 3 years and among those navelbine, topotecan, gemcitabine, and taxanes (taxol and taxotere) have yielded the most encouraging results. For mesothelioma the therapeutic results are unchanged, and no standard chemotherapy has yet been developed.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mesothelioma, Lung Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Agents, Adenocarcinoma, Combined Modality Therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Carcinoma, Large Cell, Humans, Drug Therapy, Combination, Immunotherapy, Carcinoma, Small Cell, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!