Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Centric fusion polymorphisms in waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus).

Authors: S C, Kingswood; A T, Kumamoto; S J, Charter; R A, Aman; O A, Ryder;

Centric fusion polymorphisms in waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus).

Abstract

Twenty-six captive individuals of the ellipsiprymnus subspecies group of Kobus ellipsiprymnus were found to have chromosomal complements of 2n = 50-52 (FN = 61-62), and 26 of the defassa subspecies group, including three specimens from Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya, had complements of 2n = 53-54 (FN = 62). G-banded karyotypes that were numbered according to the standard karyotype of Bos taurus revealed that variation in diploid number was the result of polymorphism for two independent centric (Robertsonian) fusions. The ellipsiprymnus group was polymorphic for a 7;11 centric fusion. Both elements of chromosome pairs 7 and 11 were fused in fusion homozygotes (2n = 50); in fusion heterozygotes (2n = 51), only one element of each pair was fused. The 7;11 fusion was lacking in specimens with 2n = 52. The defassa group was polymorphic for a 6;18 centric fusion; individuals were either heterozygous for the fusion (2n = 53) or lacking it (2n = 54). There were no defassa group individuals that were homozygous for the 6;18 fusion (2n = 52), but this may be a sampling artifact. The 6;18 fusion was fixed in the ellipsiprymnus group, whereas the 7;11 fusion was absent in the defassa group. In G- and C-banded karyotypes, all autosomal arms and the X chromosomes of the two subspecies groups appeared to be completely homologous. However, the Y chromosome was acrocentric in the ellipsiprymnus group and submetacentric in the defassa group, possibly the result of a pericentric inversion. Fixed chromosomal differences between the two subspecies groups reflect a period of supposed geographic isolation during which time they diverged genetically and phenotypically, and the centric fusion polymorphisms raise the possibility of reduced fertility in hybrids. These data, in conjunction with phenotypic and mitochondrial DNA data, suggest to us that populations of the ellipsiprymnus and defassa groups should be managed separately.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Antelopes, Karyotyping, Animals, Female, Diploidy, Artificial Gene Fusion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!