
pmid: 9478322
handle: 11562/2614
During the period 1988-1966, 737 pregnancies, in which the infant birth weight was > or = 4000 grams were studied. During the same period there were 11,631 newborns, and 6.3% of them were infants with a birth weight > or = 4000 grams. Normal vaginal delivery occurred in 583 cases (79.1%), vacuum extraction in 24 cases (3.3%) and caesarean section in 130 cases (17.6%). Regarding the caesarean section, 38 (29.2%) of them were elective and 92 (70.8%) were done in different periods of the labour. In these macrosomic babies perinatal death never occurred, but different pathological neonatal outcomes were observed and the majority of these were clavicle abruptions (39 cases: 5.3%). Maternal morbidity observed in the 607 (82.4%) cases with vaginal delivery is characterized by: 60 cases (9.8%) of vaginal and perineal tears, 4 cases (0.6%) of cervical tears, and 2 cases (0.3%) of pubic symphysis traumatic diastasis. Shoulder dystocia is the most likely outcome in fetal macrosomic delivery; for this reason we considered the diagnostic and therapeutic management of this obstetrical complication. Because the normal outcome of neonatal births actually encourages the preference for normal vaginal delivery, we concluded that mothers with macrosomic fetuses can safely be managed expectantly unless there is a high maternal and fetal risk.
Adult, Male, Shoulder, Adolescent, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Cervix Uteri, Delivery, Obstetric, Perineum, Dystocia, Fetal Macrosomia, Pregnancy, Vagina, Humans, Female, Fetal macrosomia Management of delivery Neonatal outcomes, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
Adult, Male, Shoulder, Adolescent, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Cervix Uteri, Delivery, Obstetric, Perineum, Dystocia, Fetal Macrosomia, Pregnancy, Vagina, Humans, Female, Fetal macrosomia Management of delivery Neonatal outcomes, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
