Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Failure of total uncemented trapeziometacarpal prosthesis. A multicenter study].

Authors: P, Ledoux;

[Failure of total uncemented trapeziometacarpal prosthesis. A multicenter study].

Abstract

The total trapeziometacarpal prosthesis that we have designed has been used clinically for five years. We thought it would be useful to revise failures of these prostheses in a multicentre study in order to identify the causes of the problems and to provide necessary modifications for improvement of the results. Eleven surgeons participated in this study, allowing the review of 24 failures out of a total of 188 implanted prosthesis (12.7%). One case of sepsis and three prosthesis dislocations were observed. In ten cases, we found that the cup was not correctly oriented, leading to a progressive loosening of the cup. In five cases, the shaft had sunk into the metacarpal which was associated with modification of the axis of the shaft in relation to the metacarpal in two cases. In three of these cases, the size of the shaft was too small. Twenty-three failures were reoperated. Metallosis of periprosthetic tissues was observed in 6 cases. This disadvantage has disappeared since treating the heads with ionic nitrogen implantation. A larger size of the same type of prosthesis was able to be implanted in 5 cases. A silicone prosthesis was used in 2 cases and a trapezectomy with or without ligamentoplasty was performed in 16 cases. The high failure rate related to a poor orientation of the cup has led us to increase the range of motion of the prosthesis in order to compensate for the possibly poor orientation of the cup during implantation.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Wrist Joint, Postoperative Pain, Time Factors, Bone Cements, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Failure, Radiography, Humans, Female, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Metacarpus, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!