Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Celioscopic ovariectomy. Retrospective study of 56 ovariectomies].

Authors: E, Meneux; M, Mouly; B, Haddad; N, Pernin; G, Michel; B J, Paniel;

[Celioscopic ovariectomy. Retrospective study of 56 ovariectomies].

Abstract

To describe a technique of laparoscopic oophorectomy, and evaluate its feasibility, limits and complications.We performed a retrospective study of 34 patients who underwent laparoscopic oophorectomy, from 1 December 1992 to 28 February 1995.Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil, and Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.Mean age was 58 years (range: 42 to 74 years). In post-menopausal patients with ovarian cyst, a systematic oophorectomy was performed (33 patients). Among post-menopausal women, a systematic contro-lateral oophorectomy was done in 77% of cases. Castration was preconized in one woman with previous breast carcinoma.Removal of the ovary was performed by dessication and division of the utero-ovarian junction and of the mesovarium.Among the 34 women, 32 (94%) had an exclusive laparoscopic procedure, 2 had laparo-conversion. The reasons of laparo-conversion were the presence of adhesions in one case and presumption of ovarian malignancy (Border-line ovarian tumor) in the other case. For the 32 women with laparoscopic treatment, 22 (65%) had bilateral oophorectomy. Per-operative complication rate was 6.2% (an epigastric vessel injury in one case and an hemorrhage during laparoscopic adhesiolysis in an other case). The post-operative time was uneventful.This technique of laparoscopic oophorectomy is simple, rapid and has a low rate of per and post-operative complications. In addition, this technique has the advantage to prevent the risk of ureteral injury.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Ovariectomy, Middle Aged, Surgical Instruments, Laparoscopes, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!