Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Transabdominal preperitoneal herniorraphy: technique and results.

Authors: J, Bátorfi; O, Kelemen; L, Vizsy; E, Simon; A, Bálint; G, Pósfai;

Transabdominal preperitoneal herniorraphy: technique and results.

Abstract

As enthusiasm for laparoscopic surgery has grown, laparoscopic approaches to the groin hernia have evolved. The most widely accepted laparoscopic repair employs the placement of a large sheet of mesh in a preperitoneal position to cover potential hernia spaces. Between March 1994 and February 1997 160 inguinal and 3 femoral hernia were operated of an transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) polipropylen mesh. 131 patients were operated (128 males and 3 females, ranging in age from 19 to 82 years), 31 (23%) of them had bilateral hernias. Recurrent hernia was the indication in 52 (32%) cases. Average operating time for unilateral repair was 80 minutes and for bilateral repairs was 108 minutes. Postoperative complications included 7 (4.3%) cases of transient neuralgias, 20 (12%) cord/scrotal transient seromas-hematomas and 2 (1.2%) hydrocele. The 5 (3.1%) early recurrences were considered to be caused by technical inexperience and/or too small prosthetic patch. The laparoscopic hernioplasty has definitive advantage: minimal postoperative pain, short hospital stay (average postoperative time of hospitalization 3.1 days) and early restoration of full physical activity (in 1 to 2 weeks). The method should be considered as a potential "best option" in patients with recurrences and bilateral inguinofemoral hernias.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Hematoma, Postoperative Pain, Hernia, Inguinal, Exudates and Transudates, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Polypropylenes, Hernia, Femoral, Hospitalization, Abdomen, Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Neuralgia, Female, Laparoscopy, Peritoneum, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!