
The extensive computerisation of Danish pharmacies has permitted the establishment of two large prescription registries: The Odense University Pharmacoepidemiological Database (OPED) and the Pharmacoepidemiological Prescription Database of North Jutland (PDNJ). The Danish prescription registries content, coverage, completeness and the quality of the data are discussed in this article. Furthermore, conditions for access to the data are presented. The two prescription registries cover a background population of approximately one million or 18% of the Danish population. The populations covered by the registries are stable and representative of the Danish population in general. The registries cover all reimbursed medicine at the level of the individual user. Registration of a unique and permanent personal identifier enables the compilation of longitudinal drug histories and allows the linking of prescription data to other population-based Danish registries. The degree of completeness of the Danish prescription registries is excellent for reimbursed prescription drugs. A small number of comparison studies also indicate high validity of the register information. The Danish prescription registries represent a useful new data source for pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Databases, Factual, Denmark, Research, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Registries, Drug Monitoring, Drug Monitoring/methods
Databases, Factual, Denmark, Research, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Registries, Drug Monitoring, Drug Monitoring/methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 560 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
