Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Surgical decompression of thoracic outlet syndrome; is it a worthwhile procedure?

Authors: A, Nasim; R D, Sayers; P A, Healey; P R, Bell; W W, Barrie;

Surgical decompression of thoracic outlet syndrome; is it a worthwhile procedure?

Abstract

During a 20-year period from 1974 to 1994, 37 thoracic outlet decompressions were performed. There were 28 females and six males (ratio 5:1). The median age was 37 years (range 15-64). Symptoms were predominantly neurological in 29 limbs (78%), arterial in five limbs (14%) and venous in three limbs (8%). Limb pain and paraesthesia were the most common symptoms. Surgical decompression was performed via a supraclavicular approach in 24 limbs (65%) and a transaxillary approach in 13 limbs (35%). A cervical rib was excised in 21 limbs (57%), a first rib in 10 limbs (27%), a cervical and first rib in one limb (3%) and a cervical band in five limbs (13%). Arterial reconstruction was only required in three limbs (8%). There were a total of four complications (11%). The outcome of surgical decompression was assessed by using a questionnaire completed by the patient. Overall 27 patients (87%) felt that the operation was worthwhile. These results show that surgical decompression for thoracic outlet syndrome is a worthwhile procedure and is associated with relatively few complications.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Ribs, Middle Aged, Decompression, Surgical, Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, Postoperative Complications, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!