<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 9339116
handle: 11454/34923
We report our experience with cerebrospinal fluid shunt procedures performed on 306 patients between 1983 and 1993. Patients were between the ages of one day and 15 years (average 14.9 months) on admission. Three hundred and thirty-six shunt placements and 274 revisions were done. The first complication occurred in the first postoperative month in 52 patients and within the first six months following surgery in 97 patients. Age was determined as a statistically significant factor in only infection and the slit ventricle syndrome (SVS). Shunt types and systems were not significant factors causing complications. The level of consciousness of the patients at the time of surgery influenced the rate of complications; patients with impaired consciousness at the time of surgery had higher complication rates than those operated on in a normal state of consciousness (41% and 8.5%, respectively).
WOS: A1997XZ02900011
PubMed ID: 9339116
cerebrospinal fluid shunts, Male, child, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Adolescent, Turkey, Infant, Newborn, Infant, complication, Pediatrics, RJ1-570, Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts, Prosthesis Failure, Postoperative Complications, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, hydrocephalus, Child, Hydrocephalus, Retrospective Studies
cerebrospinal fluid shunts, Male, child, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Adolescent, Turkey, Infant, Newborn, Infant, complication, Pediatrics, RJ1-570, Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts, Prosthesis Failure, Postoperative Complications, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, hydrocephalus, Child, Hydrocephalus, Retrospective Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |