Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Segmental mastectomy and tamoxifen alone provide adequate locoregional control of breast cancer in elderly women.

Authors: S, Yeh; L R, Tan; T X, O'Connell;

Segmental mastectomy and tamoxifen alone provide adequate locoregional control of breast cancer in elderly women.

Abstract

We wished to determine whether tamoxifen and local excision without breast radiation or axillary lymph node dissection provides adequate local and regional control of breast cancer in elderly women. The records of 36 women with breast cancer who were more than 70 years old and were treated only with tamoxifen and local excision from January 1985 to July 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. These patients had refused, or were considered too ill for, standard therapy. The mean follow-up was 44.1 months. Twenty-two (61%) were alive without disease, and six (17%) died of unrelated causes, without recurrence. Two (6%) were alive with metastasis, and five (14%) died with metastasis. One patient developed a breast recurrence, which was reexcised. A second patient developed metastasis and axillary recurrence, which was treated with modified radical mastectomy. Pathologic grade, tumor size, and estrogen receptor and margin status were not predictive of recurrence. In conclusion, despite the omission of breast radiation and axillary dissection, there were only two locoregional recurrences, and both were easily treated surgically. In this select group of patients, local excision and tamoxifen provided adequate locoregional control of breast cancer in elderly women.

Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Reoperation, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Estrogen Antagonists, Breast Neoplasms, Mastectomy, Segmental, Combined Modality Therapy, Disease-Free Survival, Survival Rate, Mastectomy, Modified Radical, Cause of Death, Lymphatic Metastasis, Axilla, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!