
Biomedical engineering is responsible for many of the dramatic advances in modern medicine. This has resulted in improved medical care and better quality of life for patients. However, biomedical technology has also contributed to new ethical dilemmas and has challenged some of our moral values. Bioengineers often lack adequate training in facing these moral and ethical problems. These include conflicts of interest, allocation of scarce resources, research misconduct, animal experimentation, and clinical trials for new medical devices. This paper is a compilation of our previous published papers on these topics, and it summarizes many complex ethical issues that a bioengineer may face during his or her research career or professional practice. The need for ethics training in the education of a bioengineering student is emphasized. We also advocate the adoption of a code of ethics for bioengineers.
Patient Care Team, Clinical Trials as Topic, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Conflict of Interest, United States Food and Drug Administration, Cost Allocation, Biomedical Engineering, Biocompatible Materials, Animal Testing Alternatives, Animal Welfare, United States, Ethics, Professional, Human Experimentation, Animals, Laboratory, Animals, Humans, Equipment and Supplies, Hospital
Patient Care Team, Clinical Trials as Topic, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Conflict of Interest, United States Food and Drug Administration, Cost Allocation, Biomedical Engineering, Biocompatible Materials, Animal Testing Alternatives, Animal Welfare, United States, Ethics, Professional, Human Experimentation, Animals, Laboratory, Animals, Humans, Equipment and Supplies, Hospital
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
