Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Neuropsychological and neurophysiological consequences of partial callosotomy.

Authors: C, Woiciechowsky; S, Vogel; B U, Meyer; R, Lehmann;

Neuropsychological and neurophysiological consequences of partial callosotomy.

Abstract

Sixty-five patients with lesions affecting the third ventricle (54 patients) or the corpus callosum itself (11 patients) underwent partial callosotomy or a circumscribed callosal resection. Before the surgery 20 patients were studied using the battery of cognitive, affective and behavioural tests which was repeated 10 and 100 days after surgery. No disconnection syndrome was over observed after the partial commissurotomy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex was performed in 10 patients to determine conduction time of callosal fibres by measuring inhibition of tonic voluntary electromyographic activity in muscle's ipsilateral to the activated hemisphere. It was found that this inhibition was absent in patients with lesions of the trunk of the corpus callosum and present in patients with lesions of the genu or splenium. In addition magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the corpus callosum were performed in 40 normal subjects to establish a classification system for corpus callosal area. The results showed a wide variability of the cross-sectional area of the corpus callosum. The comparison of the shape of the corpus callosum lead to a categorisation according to the presence and location of depressions on its surface.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Corpus Callosum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!