Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Intraoperative pachymetry during excimer photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors: Z Z, Nagy; I, Süveges; J, Németh;

Intraoperative pachymetry during excimer photorefractive keratectomy.

Abstract

The evaluation of pre- and intraoperative corneal thickness is of great importance in photorefractive surgery and in planning phototherapeutic treatments. The authors evaluated 14 eyes with Humphrey ultrasonic pachymeter Model 855 during photorefractive keratactomies (PTK). All treatments were performed with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 ArF excimer laser. The preoperative uncorrected visual acuity averaged 0.078 +/- 0.068. The average of preoperative correction used to obtain the best corrected visual acuity was: -6.11 +/- 3.70. The average preoperative corneal thickness was found at 548.14 +/- +/- 24.58 microns; the average thickness of the mechanically removed epithelium was: 51.5 +/- 1.49 microns. After PRK the corneal thickness decreased to 440.78 +/- 33.2 microns. The thickness of the photoablated corneal tissue was on the average 55.86 microns measured by the ultrasound pachymeter. The pachymeter values correlated well with the average of 53.21 +/- 30.19 microns thickness change calculated by the excimer laser combi modul display monitor. The authors conclude, that ultrasound pachymeter is suitable for evaluating pre- and intra-operative corneal thickness. Echobiometric pachymetry is valuable in planning and executing phototherapeutic treatment. It permits the surgeon to assess intraoperatively the thickness of the already ablated corneal tissue and reduce the risk of postoperative refractive changes. The method is also suitable for controlling the photorefractive calibration of the excimer laser.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cornea, Male, Intraoperative Period, Myopia, Visual Acuity, Humans, Female, Lasers, Excimer, Photorefractive Keratectomy, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!