Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Tangential penlight angle estimation.

Authors: B I, Sparks;

Tangential penlight angle estimation.

Abstract

A variation of the penlight shadow procedure, using tangential corneal illumination, was compared with the van Herick biomicroscopy technique for estimating the anterior chamber. The purpose was to determine if tangential penlight illumination affords the practitioner an additional, clinically valid means of estimating patency of the anterior chamber angle.Sixty-two subjects (24 males, 38 females) were evaluated with both procedures. For each subject, the temporal anterior chamber angles were estimated on the basis of the degree of nasal brightness via sclerotic scatter after temporal tangential corneal illumination. Comparisons were made with temporal angle estimation using the van Herick biomicroscopy technique.Compared with the van Herick procedure, the tangential corneal illumination technique had a sensitivity of 93.8% in the measurement of open angles, with a specificity of 83.3%. The results were statistically significant at p < 0.001.The results suggest that the tangential corneal illumination technique provides a viable alternative to angle estimation using the biomicroscope. The procedure compared favorably with previous assessments of the standard penlight shadow test. Although limited in certain aspects, the speed and ease of the procedure make it a useful diagnostic tool in situations in which conventional testing is difficult or impossible to accomplish.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Light, Anterior Chamber, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Humans, Female, Aged, Optometry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!