
A variation of the penlight shadow procedure, using tangential corneal illumination, was compared with the van Herick biomicroscopy technique for estimating the anterior chamber. The purpose was to determine if tangential penlight illumination affords the practitioner an additional, clinically valid means of estimating patency of the anterior chamber angle.Sixty-two subjects (24 males, 38 females) were evaluated with both procedures. For each subject, the temporal anterior chamber angles were estimated on the basis of the degree of nasal brightness via sclerotic scatter after temporal tangential corneal illumination. Comparisons were made with temporal angle estimation using the van Herick biomicroscopy technique.Compared with the van Herick procedure, the tangential corneal illumination technique had a sensitivity of 93.8% in the measurement of open angles, with a specificity of 83.3%. The results were statistically significant at p < 0.001.The results suggest that the tangential corneal illumination technique provides a viable alternative to angle estimation using the biomicroscope. The procedure compared favorably with previous assessments of the standard penlight shadow test. Although limited in certain aspects, the speed and ease of the procedure make it a useful diagnostic tool in situations in which conventional testing is difficult or impossible to accomplish.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Light, Anterior Chamber, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Humans, Female, Aged, Optometry
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Light, Anterior Chamber, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Humans, Female, Aged, Optometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
