Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Recovery times from subarachnoid blocks using bupivacaine hydrochloride and tetracaine hydrochloride with and without epinephrine.

Authors: M, Leonard; L, Moore; R, Algozzine; J, Gregorino; B, Giles;

Recovery times from subarachnoid blocks using bupivacaine hydrochloride and tetracaine hydrochloride with and without epinephrine.

Abstract

This retrospective study examined the length of time patients spent in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovering from a subarachnoid block with either bupivacaine hydrochloride or tetracaine hydrochloride with and without epinephrine after total knee replacement surgery or total hip replacement surgery. One hundred subjects' charts were reviewed with 50 subjects receiving a subarachnoid block with bupivacaine (25 had epinephrine added to the bupivacaine) and 50 subjects receiving a subarachnoid block with tetracaine (25 had epinephrine added to the tetracaine). There were no statistical differences among the groups with respect to age, height, weight, dose of local anesthetic, and length of surgical procedure. Patient who received tetracaine stayed longer in the PACU (64.44 minutes) and took longer to bend their knees (73.17 minutes), flex their hips (99.65 minutes), and have return of sensation (68.88 minutes), compared to those who had received bupivacaine (P < .05). When epinephrine was added to the local anesthetic, it prolonged the time until the return of knee flexion, hip flexion, and sensation by 66.82, 87.65, and 76.77 minutes respectively (P < .05).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Time Factors, Epinephrine, Convalescence, Nerve Block, Bupivacaine, Subarachnoid Space, Tetracaine, Humans, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Anesthetics, Local, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!