Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Treatment of infection by vacuum sealing].

Authors: W, Fleischmann; E, Lang; M, Russ;

[Treatment of infection by vacuum sealing].

Abstract

Between 1 January 1992 and 31 July 1995, 313 patients with acute and chronic infections were treated by vacuum sealing (VS). The average duration of VS treatment was 16.7 days, and there was an average of 3.1 changes in the VS system. In acute infections (n = 203) the wounds were closed by secondary suturing (65.5%), spontaneous epithelialization (17.2%), skin grafting (12.3%) and flap transfer (2%). Six patients died (3%). Infection recurred in 3.9% and was cured by another VS treatment. Unstable scar formations (1%) were treated by free flap transfers. When compared with standard open-wound treatment, the low-cost VS technique offers great advantages with regard to hospital hygiene, patient comfort and therapeutic results.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Reoperation, Occlusive Dressings, Abscess, Surgical Flaps, Treatment Outcome, Vacuum Curettage, Drainage, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Female, Empyema, Gels

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    129
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
129
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!