
pmid: 9189803
handle: 11390/688411 , 11390/738124 , 11392/526875 , 11391/917688
To value LCNB accuracy in the determination of morphobiological parameters and as an alternative to the open SB diagnostic procedure of breast lesions.University Hospital, Italy.From May 1992 to February 1995 196 biopsies have been performed. The diameter of the neoplasms examined varied from 0.6 to 7 cm with an average of 1.9 cm.The accuracy of the two methods in the evaluation of histological degree, receptor state, protein c-erb B2 and p53 were compared.No inadequate sampling were ever recorded. LCNB has shown values of 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The positivity and negativity predicted values obtained were 100% and 89% respectively. Retrospectively 70 sample-cases of carcinoma were selected and the morphobiological parameters evaluated. The correlation coefficients for the data obtained with SB and LCNB in the evaluation of Progesteron and Oestrogen receptor expression, protein c-erb B2 and p53 were excellent. Furthermore it was noted that LCNB allows a saving of at least 1/3 of the cost vs intraoperative SB.Percutaneous LCNB has high diagnostic accuracy for histological classification. LCNB has the same accuracy as SB for morphobiological parameters. The cost of LCNB is markedly lower than SB.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Biopsy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Biopsy, Needle, Breast Neoplasms, Breast cancer; Needle biopsy; Surgical biopsy;, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Biopsy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Biopsy, Needle, Breast Neoplasms, Breast cancer; Needle biopsy; Surgical biopsy;, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
