Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of technetium-99m-MIBI and technetium-99m-tetrofosmin uptake by musculoskeletal sarcomas.

Authors: V, Söderlund; C, Jonsson; H C, Bauer; O, Brosjö; H, Jacobsson;

Comparison of technetium-99m-MIBI and technetium-99m-tetrofosmin uptake by musculoskeletal sarcomas.

Abstract

Technetium-99m-MIBI was initially developed for heart studies but it can also be used to depict tumors, predict multidrug resistance and evaluate chemotherapy. Recently, 99mTc-tetrofosmin, which exhibits similar physical properties, has been launched for heart studies. Tumor uptake and prediction of multidrug resistance have also been reported regarding the latter tracer. A comparison of these two tracers regarding the detectability of musculoskeletal sarcoma has been made.Twenty patients with musculoskeletal sarcoma of the extremities or pelvis underwent planar examination after the administration of 99mTc-MIBI and 99mTc-tetrofosmin with an interval of 2-7 days. The tumor activity was compared with one ipsilateral and one contralateral background region.There was a small, but not significant, difference in favor of 99mTc-MIBI with regard to both background regions.Technetium-99m-MIBI and 99mTc-tetrofosmin can both be used to visualize musculoskeletal sarcomas. The choice may depend on which agent is used routinely for myocardial studies in the laboratory.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi, Muscle Neoplasms, Adolescent, Bone Neoplasms, Sarcoma, Organotechnetium Compounds, Middle Aged, Organophosphorus Compounds, Humans, Female, Radiopharmaceuticals, Radionuclide Imaging, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!