Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Zinostatin stimalamer-transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison with lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization.

Authors: N, Hirashima; K, Sakakibara; I, Itazu; T, Hirai; A, Nemoto; H, Matsuura; K, Kumada; +2 Authors

Zinostatin stimalamer-transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison with lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization.

Abstract

Twenty patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were treated by zinostatin stimalamer-transcatheter arterial embolization (SMANCS-TAE). After administration of SMANCS, a superselective catheterization technique was used to inject gelatin sponge particles into the artery or artery branch supplying the cancer-bearing segment. We compared the results of SMANCS-TAE with Lipiodol (Yamanouchi, Tokyo, Japan)-TAE performed during the same period. In 18 of 20 patients (90%), a tumor necrosis rate of 100% (grade 4) was obtained after one or two courses of SMANCS-TAE. The SMANCS group was superior to the Lipiodol-TAE group in terms of the tumor reduction rate, alpha-fetoprotein reduction rate, and cumulative 1.5-year survival rate, but not significantly. No severe side effects were noted after SMANCS-TAE. SMANCS-TAE appears to have potential as a new treatment for hepatocellularcarcinoma, and patients treated with this technique will be monitored to elucidate the long-term effects.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Liver Neoplasms, Iodized Oil, Middle Aged, Radiography, Survival Rate, Zinostatin, Doxorubicin, Humans, Polystyrenes, Female, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Aged, Epirubicin, Maleic Anhydrides

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!