Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ureaplasma urealyticum infections in the perinatal period.

Authors: E E, Wang; A G, Matlow; A, Ohlsson; S C, Nelson;

Ureaplasma urealyticum infections in the perinatal period.

Abstract

Good evidence indicates the widespread carriage of U. urealyticum among sexually active females. Colonization of the upper genital tract appears to be a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes, though this is not the case for lower-genital-tract colonization. Based on studies in which amniotic fluid obtained from amniocenteses was already positive for U. urealyticum, and its high prevalence in very-LBW neonates, it is likely that the infection is acquired during early pregnancy. A number of observational studies have linked this organism to pulmonary infections, meningeal infections, and bacteremias, particularly in LBW neonates. It is difficult, however, to separate the morbidity that is directly attributable to infection with the organism from morbidity owing to extreme prematurity. Problems in measuring the burden of illness resulting from this organism are compounded by difficulties in its diagnosis. The organism's fastidious nature prevents many laboratories from isolating it from specimens. Rapid and practical methods for identifying the organism are urgently needed. These need to be followed by RCTs to determine if outcomes of pregnant women and babies with various conditions, from whom the organism has been isolated, can be improved through treatment with antimicrobial agents.

Keywords

Pregnancy, Ureaplasma Infections, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Humans, Female, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!