Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ventilation scintigraphy of the middle ear.

Authors: W, Brenner; K H, Bohuslavizki; B, Kroker; W, Peters; H, Wolf; C, Sippel; M, Clausen; +2 Authors

Ventilation scintigraphy of the middle ear.

Abstract

In this study, an attempt was made to administer radioactive gas into the tympanic cavity to measure initial gas trappings as well as clearance from the middle ear to evaluate eustachian tube function.Twenty-eight patients were administered 50 MBq 133Xe gas. Three different methods for gas application were tested: (a) direct injection through a tympanostomy tube in two patients, (b) administration through a nasopharyngeal catheter combined with Valsalva maneuvers in six subjects without middle ear dysfunction and (c) insufflation into the pharyngeal space through a nose olive performed in 12 patients with normal eustachian tube function and in eight patients with one-sided tube dysfunction.All three approaches were successful in visualizing middle ear ventilation, demonstrating tracer trapping within the tympanic cavities in 20 of 28 patients. Semiquantitative evaluation by region of interest techniques revealed a left-to-right uptake ratio of 48.4%-51.6% in 13 patients without tube dysfunction. Five patients with one-sided tube dysfunction showed a significantly lower median uptake of 31.6% (p = 0.01). The clearance half-lives ranged from 9 to 283 min in normal subjects and 37-64 min in patients with one-sided tube malfunction, demonstrating no statistically significant difference between the two groups and a trend towards increased washout in patients with tympanic dysfunction.Middle ear ventilation scintigraphy with 133Xe through a nose olive is an easy-to-perform test to evaluate eustachian tube function and has a success rate of about 70%, thus, reflecting the complex physiological mechanisms involved.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aerosols, Male, Ear, Middle, Middle Aged, Middle Ear Ventilation, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Ear Diseases, Radionuclide Imaging, Xenon Radioisotopes, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!