Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Use of a modified monocanalicular silicone stent in 33 eyelids.

Authors: J A, Mauriello; A, Abdelsalam;

Use of a modified monocanalicular silicone stent in 33 eyelids.

Abstract

To determine (1) whether a modified monocanalicular silicone stent fixated to the peripunctal tissues by a 6-0 polypropylene suture is a practical alternative to bicanalicular intubation for canalicular reconstruction, and (2) whether this technique is superior to previously described methods of monocanalicular intubation.The charts of patients from the Oculoplastics Division of the Ophthalmology Department at the UMDNJ Medical School who had undergone insertion of a modified canalicular stent were retrospectively reviewed from April 1, 1991, to April 1, 1995.The technique was used successfully in 33 eyelids (32 patients) for the following conditions: (1) unicanalicular (17 eyelids) and bicanalicular lacerations (1 eyelid), (2) reconstruction of a single canaliculus after eyelid tumor resection (5 eyelids), (3) after canaliculotomy for canaliculitis refractory to medical treatment (3 eyelids), and (4) after punctal plasty for congenital punctal agenesis and after a three-snip procedure for acquired punctal stenosis (6 eyelids). Tubes were maintained in position for a median of 11.5 weeks. Complications included erosion of the anterior aspect on the lid margin (1 eyelid) and premature tube extrusion (1 eyelid) that required reinsertion of another monocanalicular stent. All patients had normal results on dye disappearance tests after surgery and no patients experienced postoperative tearing.The monocanalicular silicone stent is technically simple to perform and is an effective method of monocanalicular intubation that may avoid the need for bicanalicular intubation in certain circumstances.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases, Suture Techniques, Silicones, Eyelids, Infant, Middle Aged, Polypropylenes, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Stents, Child, Nasolacrimal Duct, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!