
To determine the potentials and limitations of a recently developed algorithm for virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) based on 3-dimensional (3-D) magnetic resonance (MR) data sets.The data from 6 patients derived from gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries were reviewed. All patients had unilateral or bilateral renal arterial pathologies (stenoses n = 2, aneurysms n = 4). Imaging was performed on a 1.5-T scanner using a 3-D gradient-echo MR sequence. The imaging parameters were as follows: TR/TE/flip angle 3.9/1.9/40 degrees, matrix 256 x 192, slice thickness 1.5 to 2 mm, FOV 32 cm, and 48 slices. Image acquisition time was 28 seconds under apnoeia conditions. A total of 60 ml 0.5 molar Gd-DTPA was injected during the scan.3-D data sets could be obtained in all patients and postprocessed for VIE. The intraluminal vessel wall was depicted with high clarity in all cases. All pathologies that were not intraparenchymal could be easily seen. Limitations to the technique include the image quality of the original data set, use of the ideal threshold to minimise intraluminal artifacts, and a complicated prescription sequence.We have shown that VIE can be consistently performed in the renal arteries using MR data sets acquired with a contrast enhanced 3-D gradient-echo technique. It provides a hitherto unused approach to viewing 3-D vascular MR data sets.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Contrast Media, Endoscopy, Gadolinium, Renal Artery Obstruction, User-Computer Interface, Renal Artery, Humans, Female, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Contrast Media, Endoscopy, Gadolinium, Renal Artery Obstruction, User-Computer Interface, Renal Artery, Humans, Female, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Aged
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
