
Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry (SWAP) uses a two-color increment threshold procedure (blue-on-yellow) to assess the functional status of short-wavelength-sensitive (SWS) mechanisms. This functional test has been shown to detect visual field abnormalities in patients at high risk of developing glaucoma and in patients with optic neuritis when standard (white-on-white) visual fields are still within normal limits. Often times, damage uncovered by SWAP precedes standard field loss by three or more years. SWAP also reveals a greater spatial extent of visual field damage in glaucoma patients than standard perimetry and can herald progression of standard visual field damage into the areas already classified as abnormal by SWAP.This paper describes the SWAP technique and briefly discusses the current theories that account for SWAP's ability to detect visual field damage at an earlier stage than standard perimetry. Several cases that demonstrate the usefulness of this technique are reported.SWAP testing appears to be the most sensitive functional test for early detection of glaucomatous damage currently available. Although SWAP testing has a few disadvantages, none of them significantly restrict the clinical application of SWAP for glaucoma evaluation.
Male, Vision Disorders, Glaucoma, Professional Practice, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ophthalmology, Humans, Visual Field Tests, Ocular Hypertension, Visual Fields, Aged
Male, Vision Disorders, Glaucoma, Professional Practice, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ophthalmology, Humans, Visual Field Tests, Ocular Hypertension, Visual Fields, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
