Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The case for parallel classification of biliary tract and pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors: D S, Longnecker; P G, Terhune;

The case for parallel classification of biliary tract and pancreatic neoplasms.

Abstract

Most primary epithelial neoplasms found in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tracts and the pancreas have similar histologic appearances. The degree of similarity of tumor types is greater than is commonly appreciated and extends to rare neoplasms. It has been suggested that parallel classifications could be used for tumors arising in these sites. However, significant differences in terms used to denote histologically identical neoplasms are found in the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of biliary tract tumors and the new WHO classification of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms. Mutations of oncogenes and abnormalities of tumor suppressor genes found in ductal adenocarcinomas from the two sites are also similar, although they have somewhat different frequencies. These histologic and molecular similarities provide strong support for the use of parallel descriptive diagnostic terminology for neoplasms arising in the pancreas and the biliary tract. The revised WHO classification of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms accommodates most types of biliary tract neoplasms and provides a new basis for standardization of nomenclature.

Keywords

Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biliary Tract Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Oncogenes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!