
The objectives of this study were to determine if a standardized gentamicin dosing protocol would improve clinical effectiveness, yield higher peak serum concentrations, and improve the success rate of attaining peaks in the desired range when compared with empiric dosing practices used by prescribers. The study was conducted as a before-after program effectiveness evaluation in non-critically ill patients, aged 16-65 y with stable renal function, who were prescribed gentamicin. A standardized dose of 2 mg/kg (ideal or adjusted weight) was administered intravenously every 12 h in the intervention phase. Response to therapy (time to defervescence, white cell count, reinstitution of antibiotic therapy), serum concentrations (peaks > 10 mumol/L (5.6 mg/L) and troughs < 4 mumol/L (2.2 mg/L)), and toxicity were monitored in both groups. Thirty-four consecutive patients were enrolled into the control phase and an equal number into the intervention phase. Surgical patients comprised the majority of the study population. Desired peak concentrations were attained in 97% of intervention vs. 59% of control patients (p < 0.001). Mean peak serum concentrations were higher in the intervention phase than in the control phase, 16.1 mumol/L vs. 11.2 mumol/L (p < 0.001), respectively. Median time to become afebrile trended toward a statistical decrease in the intervention as compared to the control group, 3 vs. 5 d (p = 0.076), respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical effectiveness nor in the occurrence of nephro- or ototoxicity. Continued evaluation of this dosing protocol is warranted.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Fever, Body Weight, Middle Aged, Drug Administration Schedule, Creatinine, Leukocytes, Humans, Female, Gentamicins, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Fever, Body Weight, Middle Aged, Drug Administration Schedule, Creatinine, Leukocytes, Humans, Female, Gentamicins, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
