Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Differential and antagonistic effects of v-Jun and c-Jun.

Authors: M, Gao; I, Morgan; P K, Vogt;

Differential and antagonistic effects of v-Jun and c-Jun.

Abstract

We compared the ability of cellular and viral Jun (c-Jun and v-Jun) to transactivate target genes. c-Jun and v-Jun bind specifically to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate responsive elements [TREs, also called activator protein 1 (AP-1) motifs]. However, whereas c-Jun activates TRE-controlled promoters, v-Jun represses them. Cotransfection of the two Jun proteins reduces c-Jun-dependent transactivation. The expression of the endogenous c-jun gene, regulated through a promoter-proximal AP-1-binding site, is repressed in v-Jun-transformed chicken embryo fibroblasts. It is suggested that an M(r) 18,000 v-Jun peptide prominent in v-Jun-transformed cells acts as a transdominant-negative regulator of AP-1 activity and of c-jun expression. In contrast to the results with TRE sites, both v-Jun and c-Jun activate transcription through the human T-cell leukemia virus type I 21-bp repeat which contains a sequence homologous to the cyclic AMP responsive element. However, full-length Jun proteins bind to this site only with low affinity, and binding of the truncated v-Jun was barely detectable. These observations show that the oncogenic viral form of Jun differs from the cellular version in promoter preference and on certain promoters acts as an antagonist to c-Jun.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cell Nucleus, Human T-lymphotropic virus 1, Binding Sites, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun, Blotting, Western, Molecular Sequence Data, Oncogene Protein p65(gag-jun), Gene Expression, Chick Embryo, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Recombinant Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, jun, Consensus Sequence, Animals, Humans, Collagenases, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Cells, Cultured, DNA Primers

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!