Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The subspecies specificity of Babesia canis].

Authors: S, Hauschild; E, Schein;

[The subspecies specificity of Babesia canis].

Abstract

The large Babesia species of dogs, Babesia canis, is transmitted by different ticks. Dermacentor reticulatus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus and haemaphysalis leachi are the known main vectors. Four B. canis isolates of different geographic origin were investigated for their transmission specificity and pathogenicity in infection trials. R. sanguineus ticks exclusively transmitted the Babesia isolate from Egypt. D. reticulatus was the vector for isolates from Hungary and France. Transmission of an South-African isolate was only possible by H. laechi. The B. canis isolates differed markedly in their pathogenicity. The South-African isolate was highly pathogenic and resulted in nearly complete mortality. Infections with the isolate from Hungary transmitted by D. reticulatus, also resulted in severe clinical disease which often ended fatal without treatment with an anti-Babesia drug. Clinical disease also resulted from infections with the French isolate while the isolate from Egypt was largely non-pathogenic. Challenge trials for investigations of cross-immunity demonstrated immunogenic differences between the individual isolates. The degree of immunogenicity appeared to be related to the pathogenicity of the Babesia isolates. Serological investigations revealed that antigen of the isolate from Hungary in ELISA reacted markedly higher than the other three antigens. Due to their vector specificity B. canis classification into three groups is possible: B. canis canis transmitted by D. reticulatus, B. canis vogeli transmitted by R. sanguineus and B. canis rossi transmitted by H. laechi.

Keywords

Dogs, Ticks, Species Specificity, Babesiosis, Animals, Babesia, Arachnid Vectors, Dog Diseases

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!