
We conducted a review of laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) and open appendectomies (OA) over a 3-year period, including 720 patients (253 LA, 467 OA) who underwent appendectomy during the study period. Computer records were reviewed with respect to demographics, length of stay, operating room time, operating room cost, hospital cost, and morbidity. All patients were sent surveys to assess their posthospitalization recovery. The LA patients had significant shorter hospital stays (2.06 days vs. 3.44 days, p < .001), lower morbidity rates (5 vs 14%, p < .02), and comparable overall hospital costs ($4,800 vs. $4,950). The LA patients also reported less postoperative pain and were able to return to work sooner. Our results show that LA can significantly decrease morbidity and hospital stay with a comparable hospital cost and result in quicker patient recovery.
Adult, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Length of Stay, Appendicitis, Prognosis, Patient Satisfaction, Costs and Cost Analysis, Appendectomy, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy
Adult, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Length of Stay, Appendicitis, Prognosis, Patient Satisfaction, Costs and Cost Analysis, Appendectomy, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
