
The aim of this study was to further investigate the pathogenesis and epidemiology of feline coronavirus (FCoV)-infections and among others to determine the prognostic value of a positive result in the RT-PCR for FCoV in serum samples collected from cats with abdominal signs. Viral RNA was isolated from 100 microl of serum and subsequently amplified by a nested RT-PCR using primers binding to a highly conserved region of the 3'-end of the FCoV-genome. Sixty-three serum samples collected from 62 cats with abdominal signs were examined by RT-PCR and the clinical outcome was followed up. Four of these cats with a positive PCR-result are healthy more than 70 months after the collection of the blood sample. It can be concluded that viremia with FCoV does not necessarily lead to FIP and death. With respect to diagnosing FIP, a positive FCoV-RT-PCR is of low prognostic and diagnostic value. It can not be recommended to use this assay as sole indication to euthanize cats. Further studies will have to be carried out to demonstrate if the prognostic and diagnostic value of this PCR-assay in other samples such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells is more reliable. However, this method was found to be an important tool to further study the pathogenesis and epidemiology of FIP.
Diergeneeskunde, Base Sequence, Prognosis, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Feline Infectious Peritonitis, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Cats, Animals, RNA, Viral, Coronavirus, Feline, Conserved Sequence, DNA Primers
Diergeneeskunde, Base Sequence, Prognosis, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Feline Infectious Peritonitis, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Cats, Animals, RNA, Viral, Coronavirus, Feline, Conserved Sequence, DNA Primers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
