Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Maximal inspiratory pressure in elite soccer players.

Authors: L, Fuso; V, Di Cosmo; B, Nardecchia; S, Sammarro; G, Pagliari; R, Pistelli;

Maximal inspiratory pressure in elite soccer players.

Abstract

The respiratory muscle strength of elite athletes has been assessed only for some competitive sports and different conclusions have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inspiratory muscle strength in a group of professional soccer players in comparison with a group of sedentary subjects. Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (PImax) was measured both at Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) and at Residual Volume (RV) in 130 subjects: 27 of these were elite soccer players (all males, aged 22 +/- 3 years) and 103 were normal sedentary subjects (77 males and 26 females, aged 44 +/- 19 years). Predictive linear models were produced by a stepwise regression analysis in the whole sample of subjects. Both PImaxFRC and PImaxRV models included female gender and ageing as negative predictors, and Body Mass Index (BMI) as positive predictor of the inspiratory pressures. The model predicting PImaxFRC was slightly more accurate than the model predicting PImaxRV (r-squared: 0.38 vs 0.36, respectively). After adjustment for the variables entered in these models, PImaxFRC and PImaxRV were respectively 1.54 KPa and 1.08 KPa higher in soccer players than in sedentary subjects but this result was statistically significant (p < 0.02) only for PImaxFRC. We conclude that the inspiratory muscle strength is increased in soccer players and PImax measured at FRC seems more sensitive in order to discriminate between subjects with different level of physical activity.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Respiratory Muscles, Body Mass Index, Soccer, Humans, Female, Exercise, Inspiratory Capacity, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!