Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Medication nebulizer performance. Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand.

Authors: D, Hess; D, Fisher; P, Williams; S, Pooler; R M, Kacmarek;

Medication nebulizer performance. Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand.

Abstract

Medication nebulizers are commonly used to delivery aerosolized medications to patients with respiratory disease. We evaluated output and respirable aerosol available to the patient (inhaled mass) for 17 medication nebulizers using a spontaneous breathing lung model.Three nebulizer fill volumes (3, 4, and 5 mL containing 2.5 mg of albuterol) and 3 oxygen flows (6, 8, and 10 L/min) were evaluated using the 17 nebulizers. A cotton plug at the nebulizer mouthpiece was used to trap aerosol during simulated spontaneous breathing. Following each trial, the amount of albuterol remaining in the nebulizer and the amount deposited in the cotton plug were determined spectrophotometrically. Aerosol particle size was determined using an 11-stage cascade impactor.Increasing fill volume decreased the amount of albuterol trapped in the dead volume (p < 0.001) and increased the amount delivered to the patient (p < 0.001). Increasing flow increased the mass output of particles in the respirable range of 1 to 5 microns (p = 0.004), but the respirable mass delivered to the patient was affected to a greater extent by nebulizer brand (p < 0.001) than flow. Although 2.5 mg of albuterol was placed into the nebulizers, less than 0.5 mg in the respirable range of 1 to 5 microns was delivered to the mouthpiece.The performance of medication nebulizers is affected by fill volume, flow, and nebulizer brand. When they are used for research applications, the nebulizer characteristics must be evaluated and reported for the conditions used in the investigation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aerosols, Models, Structural, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Administration, Inhalation, Humans, Albuterol, Equipment Design, Particle Size, Bronchodilator Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    181
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
181
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!