
Over the last three years, 53 patients underwent transjugular portosystemic shunting (TIPS). 49 patients were treated successfully (92.5%). Procedure-related morbidity (intention to treat) was seen in 11 patients (20.8%): encephalopathy (n = 5), sepsis (n = 3), right heart failure (n = 2) and progressive liver failure (n = 1). 30-day mortality rate was 13.2% (7/53); five of these patients were in stage Child-Pugh C, one patient in stage B, and one patient had a known coronary heart disease. 30-day rebleeding rate was 6.1% (3/49), but all these patients could be retreated successfully by radiological methods (PTA, embolisation, thrombolysis). Angiographic follow-up (mean six months) of 35 patients detected 30 (85.7%) haemodynamic relevant obstructions (stenosis of stent: n = 4, stenosis of hepatic vein: n = 15, stenosis of stent and hepatic vein: n = 5, occlusion of TIPS-shunt: n = 6). Secondary patency rate following percutaneous reintervention was 91.3%. All rebleedings in the follow-up (n = 7) were treated successfully by TIPS-revision. Five out of 12 patients (41.7%) with refractory ascites were treated successfully by TIPS (complete resolution of ascites after three months: n = 4, significant reduction of ascites: n = 1). We conclude that transjugular portosystemic shunt is an effective way of treating portal hypertension, but there is a need to develop methods to prevent the high incidence of shunt stenosis.
Adult, Male, Contraindications, Middle Aged, Radiography, Hepatic Artery, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Hypertension, Portal, Humans, Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical, Female, Stents, Aged
Adult, Male, Contraindications, Middle Aged, Radiography, Hepatic Artery, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Hypertension, Portal, Humans, Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical, Female, Stents, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
