Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Percutaneous lumbar diskectomy].

Authors: M J, Albeck; J, Jørgensen; S E, Børgesen; O, Fedders; J, Haase; F, Gjerris;

[Percutaneous lumbar diskectomy].

Abstract

The results after percutaneous lumbar discectomy were evaluated in 52 patients with low back pain corresponding to the L5 or S1 root. All patients were examined with a median follow-up time of 14 weeks. The patients were divided in two groups. Group 1: patients with an obvious indication for surgery (29 patients) and group 2: patients with a relative indication for surgery (23 patients). The follow-up results for patients in group 1 were comparable with the results after conventional discectomy. The results concerning follow-up low back pain in groups 1 and 2 were good or excellent in 69% and 43% of the patients respectively. The corresponding results for sciatica were 69% and 65% respectively. It is concluded that percutaneous lumbar discectomy is a possible alternative to conventional discectomy in selected patients.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Lumbar Vertebrae, Adolescent, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Diskectomy, Percutaneous, Female, Middle Aged, Low Back Pain, Intervertebral Disc Displacement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!