Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The role of portography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal neoplasms].

Authors: A, Leone; P, Violino; D, Ghirardo; L, Fioranti; M, Borrelli; A, Scarrone; C, Ambrogi; +4 Authors

[The role of portography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal neoplasms].

Abstract

This study was performed to confirm the high sensitivity of CT during arterial portography (CTAP) versus US and dynamic CT in the diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ninety patients with 108 colorectal cancers underwent US, dynamic CT and CTAP to investigate the presence of liver metastases. US depicted 39 metastases in 26 patients, dynamic CT 46 metastases in 29 patients and CTAP 54 lesions in 34 patients. CTAP detected 8 metastases missed at dynamic CT; 4 of them were 2 cm in diameter. After preoperative investigations only 7 patients were considered for hepatic resection. At surgery, palpation and intraoperative US of the liver detected two more metastases in the same patients. Our experience, in agreement with recent studies, confirms CTAP as the most sensitive preoperative method in detecting liver metastases and its superiority to be most apparent in lesions < 1 cm in diameter. Therefore, we consider CTAP an essential imaging technique for planning the correct treatment of liver metastases.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Portography, Liver Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Liver, Humans, Female, Colorectal Neoplasms, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!