
pmid: 8608446
pmc: PMC1369365
Yeast ribosomal protein L32, RPL32, specifically represses splicing by binding to a purine-rich asymmetric loop adjacent to the 5' splice site of its own transcript. A potential G:U pair closes the internal loop and the goal of the present study is to understand what features of the putative G:U pair are recognized by RPL32. Two RNA oligomers containing 10 and 13 nt were annealed to form a bimolecular stem-loop-stem protein-binding site. Protein binding to each of 16 sequence variants was examined using electrophoretic bandshift and filter-binding experiments. The proteins binds to only the duplex RNA and not to the individual oligomers, and the G:U pair is critical for full-strength binding. Mutational studies show that the duplex having a G:U has the highest protein affinity (Kd = 10 nM), followed by RNAs bearing G:A, C:C, U:A, U:C, or G:G. Duplexes containing the other possible pairs bind very weakly and Watson-Crick pairing does not favor protein binding. The G of the G:U is required for strong protein binding, but replacement by inosine reduces binding only modestly. Therefore, the minor groove guanine amino group is not a key protein recognition element. Both nucleotides of the pair influence the binding strength, but their contributions are in general not additive. These data imply that the G:U is probably paired and influences binding indirectly through its effect on the conformation of the RNA.
Ribosomal Proteins, Base Composition, Base Sequence, RNA Splicing, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Binding, RNA, Double-Stranded
Ribosomal Proteins, Base Composition, Base Sequence, RNA Splicing, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Binding, RNA, Double-Stranded
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
