Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Materials for hip endoprostheses--alternatives to standard materials].

Authors: K, Bosdorf; I, Mollenhauer; G, Willmann; U, Boenick;

[Materials for hip endoprostheses--alternatives to standard materials].

Abstract

A review of current clinically applied biomaterials for the femoral heads and acetabular cups of total hip prostheses (UHMWPE, CoCrMo alloys, alumina and zirkonium) in terms of their resistance to wear is presented. Further developments in metallic and ceramic materials over the last few years have now left UHMWPE as the weakest link in the prosthesis material chain. Alternative materials aimed at improving the tribological properties of the femoral head/acetabular head system are presented. New surface hardening and coating techniques for titanium alloys, polymer coatings, optimized UHMWPE, as well as various carbon-fibre-reinforced synthetic materials are described. The advantages, disadvantages and prospects of these materials are compared with those of standard materials and documented in experimental and clinical studies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Surface Properties, Materials Testing, Humans, Biocompatible Materials, Hip Prosthesis, Prosthesis Failure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!