Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Fetal acoustic stimulation as an adjunct to external cephalic version.

Authors: R L, Johnson; T H, Strong; T G, Radin; J P, Elliott;

Fetal acoustic stimulation as an adjunct to external cephalic version.

Abstract

To evaluate fetal acoustic stimulation (FAS) as an adjunct to external cephalic version in a midline fetal spine presentation.Breech presentation in a woman presenting for attempted version at 37 weeks' gestation with a fetus in a midline position and the spine anterior is difficult to convert to a vertex. An evaluation of FAS to assist in repositioning the fetus in a more spine lateral position was carried out. Patients with a failed version attempt and a midline breech presentation were enrolled in the study. The patient served as her own control. If that attempt failed, an electrolarynx device was used to produce a one- to three-second stimulus, and then another version attempt was made.Sixteen patients were enrolled. Prior to FAS, 0/16 fetuses were successfully turned. FAS altered the position in 100% of patients from spine midline to lateral. After FAS, 15/16 (94%) were successfully converted to vertex presentation. The one patient whose fetus failed to convert also failed her second version attempt (P < .0005).FAS may improve the opportunity for successful external cephalic version in the properly selected candidate with a fetus in a midline position with the spine anterior.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Patient Selection, Prognosis, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Treatment Outcome, Acoustic Stimulation, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Breech Presentation, Fetal Monitoring, Version, Fetal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!