
In summary, the evidence cited in this article argues convincingly for the conclusion that if some time scheduling actually endangers the health and well-being of two of the vital human ingredients for the existence of a hospital, its nurses and its patients, then these practices are abusive. Furthermore, if nurses are deemed capable of fulfilling the varied and complex duties that sustain the lives of others, surely they are capable of taking responsible action to prevent or alleviate the conditions that put their own health and well-being at stake. But this is not possible without education that informs and the motivation to act. One level at which education and motivation are both at their best is in the new nursing graduate. Schools of nursing have the responsibility of giving graduates the best chance possible for safe, competent, and successful practice. Practicing nurses have a responsibility too. Besides being the best role models possible, we have the responsibility to give new graduates the best legacy possible.
Health Status, Work Schedule Tolerance, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Humans, Nursing Staff
Health Status, Work Schedule Tolerance, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Humans, Nursing Staff
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
