
If clinical quality assurance and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic testing are to be measured, some sort of measurement of the clinical value of a test result is needed. The predictive value of a test result is not a real measure of its clinical value, and, particularly, when used in the later stages of a diagnostic workup, it can be misleading. Using the same data that go into a calculation of predictive value, the clinical value can be determined according to the amount of useful information that is provided by a test result. Cost-effectiveness can be expressed as dollars per bit of diagnostic information.
Quality Control, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans
Quality Control, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
